The bill which seeks to legalise online court proceedings in line with the present social distancing passed first reading on Tuesday at the Upper House.
The Bill titled: “1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Alteration) Bill, 2020” was sponsored by Senator Michael Opeyemi Bamidele (Ekiti Central).
According to the Bill, court proceedings or hearings conducted via zoom, skype, WhatsApp video or any other social media platform or technological innovation would be deemed legal after the Constitution has been amended to reflect the new proposals.
The provisions of the Bill as contained in the draft copy, include Section 36 sub-section (3) which states that “this section is hereby amended by the addition of the following:
“Provided that nothing in this Subsection shall invalidate proceedings of a Court or the proceedings of a tribunal relating to matters mentioned in subsection (1) of this section (including the announcement of the decisions of the court or tribunal) where same is held by remote hearing or any virtual means now in existence or yet to be developed.
“Section 36 subsection (4) is hereby amended by the addition of subparagraph (c) as follows: (c) Nothing in the foregoing paragraphs shall invalidate proceedings of a court or the proceedings of a tribunal relating to matters mentioned in subsection (1) of this section (including the announcement of the decisions of the court or tribunal) where same is held by remote hearing or any virtual means now in existence or yet to be developed.
“Section 36 subsection (12) is hereby amended by the addition of the following subsection (13): In this section, “remote hearing” means proceedings or hearing of court conducted via zoom, skype, WhatsApp video or any other social media platform or technological innovation”.
The sponsor of the Bill explained further that Section 36 (3) of the Constitution is sufficiently controversial enough now in terms of requirement of public hearing and determination of disputes.
This according to him endangers the results of proceedings eventually held virtually.
“Except the amendment is done urgently, the whole judicial functions of the Nation will remain paralysed,” he said.
According to him, the Bill requires expeditious consideration and passage in view of its desirability.
Bamidele said: “It is s a case of emergency now. Upon Second Reading, the States can be given three days to make returns so that before the end of the month, the process is completed.
“The National Judicial Council in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic and the inability of Courts to hold courtroom proceedings had taken steps to ensure continued administration of justice through virtual proceedings in accordance with global best practices, with some State Chief Judges coming out to openly adopt and implement the NJC guidelines.
“However, Nigerian Lawyers have been divided over this issue as there has been an ongoing debate among legal practitioners as to whether or not virtual hearing is really hearing as provided for in the Constitution.
“While some are insisting that the word “public” in the Constitution shall continue to mean physical courtroom or other designated place unless and until the relevant provisions in Section 36 of the Constitution are amended.”
However, Senator Bamidele who is a member of the Body of Benchers, added that “in the interim, the NJC has a responsibility to work with stakeholders to manage the current situation until we rewrite our Constitution in this regard as neither the practice direction, rules of court, nor an Act of the National Assembly can change the legal position so that we do not bury our heads in the sand yet again until the sand is blown off by the storm of Section 1, subsection 3 (inconsistency clause) of the Constitution if and when it is ignited.”
He appealed for the understanding of the media as he insisted the details and general principles of the Bill, which just passed the first reading, must first be debated on the floor of the Senate when it comes up for second reading during the next legislative day before it can become a matter for news analysis.
According to him, “once copies of the Bill are distributed among Senators to enable them to study the details before the next adjourned date, other Distinguished Senators would be able to make their further inputs if any, while the Bill would be subjected to public scrutiny through a public hearing for Stakeholders both from the bar and the bench to actively participate in fine-tuning it as a very important piece of legislation.”