By DAYO ADESULU
The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has sharply criticized the recent court order mandating the confiscation of Dele Farotimi’s book, Nigeria and its Criminal Justice System, labelling it a severe blow to intellectual freedom and democratic principles.
Condemnation of Anti-Intellectualism
HURIWA denounced the court order as a regressive step akin to medieval censorship:
“This order is anachronistic and reminiscent of actions nearly a thousand years ago, where books deemed contrary to certain interests were destroyed. Such measures have no place in a modern democracy,” the group asserted.
Additionally, HURIWA condemned the warning issued to bookstores by Afe Babalola’s law firm, calling it unconstitutional and a violation of fundamental rights.
Violation of Fair Hearing and Commerce Rights
HURIWA emphasized that the bookstores affected were neither parties to the legal case nor granted fair hearings as required under Section 36(5) of the Nigerian Constitution.
“The blanket warning to bookshops not to stock or sell the book constitutes a gross violation of their rights. It punishes entities that have not been accused or convicted of any wrongdoing, setting a dangerous precedent,” the organization said.
Call for Intellectual Engagement Over Censorship
Rather than pursuing judicial censorship, HURIWA encouraged a more constructive approach:
“The most effective response to ideas, whether agreeable or not, is to present superior arguments and evidence. Intellectual battles should be fought with reason, not repression,” HURIWA argued.
Risks of Piracy and Underground Trading
HURIWA also warned that suppressing legitimate book sales could lead to unintended consequences:
- Piracy Surge: Restricting access to the book could drive underground trading and black-market operations.
- Intellectual Property Risks: Such actions undermine respect for intellectual property rights and weaken the publishing industry.
“Blocking legitimate avenues for accessing a book creates fertile ground for black-market operations, undermining intellectualism and respect for the rule of law,” the group cautioned.
Books as Catalysts for Societal Progress
HURIWA argued that controversial works should be allowed to spark meaningful dialogue:
“Books, irrespective of their content, serve as mirrors of society. Attempting to erase such reflections is not only futile but detrimental to our collective progress as a nation,” the organization added.
A Warning from History
The group invoked historical examples to highlight the dangers of suppressing ideas:
“From the Crusades to authoritarian regimes of the 20th century, history shows that suppressing books and ideas fuels resentment and undermines progress. Nigeria must learn from the past and embrace intellectual freedom to build a society where justice and knowledge thrive.”
Call to Action
HURIWA urged the judiciary, the Nigerian Bar Association, and other stakeholders to prioritize:
- Constitutional Protections: Ensuring judicial orders respect fundamental rights.
- Robust Debate: Encouraging intellectual engagement over censorship.
The controversy surrounding Dele Farotimi’s book has reignited debates on intellectual freedom in Nigeria, with HURIWA’s stance underscoring the importance of safeguarding democratic ideals and the rule of law.
