The United States Commissioner for Securities and Exchange Commission SEC, Hester Peirce has said that the foolish governments are the ones who try to ban cryptocurrency.
She compares banning bitcoin to shutting down the internet, stating that governments would be foolish to try.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce shared her view of governments banning bitcoin and cryptocurrency regulation in an interview at Marketwatchās Investing in Crypto event last week. She was also asked about the likelihood of the securities regulator approving bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) this year, Bitcoin.com reports.
Peirce, sometimes known as ācrypto mom,ā has beenĀ pushingĀ for the SEC to approve a bitcoin ETF for several years. She was asked during the interview whether banning cryptocurrencies is a possibility since some people still believe that governments can always ban bitcoin, including Bridgewater Associates founderĀ Ray Dalio, The Big ShortāsĀ Michael Burry, andĀ Ron Paul. The commissioner replied:
I think we were past that point very early on because you would have to shut down the internet. As Iāve said in the past, I donāt see how you could ban it ⦠I think that it would be a foolish thing for the government to try to do that.
READ ALSO: US Senate Confirms MIT Professor Gensler as New SEC Chairman
She pointed out nonetheless that governments ācould certainly make the effortā to ban bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies. She explained that āA government could say itās not allowed here but people would still be able to do it and it would be very hard to stop people from doing it.ā
However, the commissioner stressed that there is āA bigger problemā in banning cryptocurrency, which āis that we would be missing out on the innovation around bitcoin and other digital assets if we decided to try to stop them.ā
Commissioner Peirce was also asked if this year is the year the SEC will approve a bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) as many investors are expecting. āThat is the big question that everyone has,ā she replied, adding that her answer is the same one that sheās had for the last three years, āwhich is I donāt know.ā
She noted that the SEC is in a period of transition with a new chairman,Ā Gary Gensler, likely to be confirmed in the next couple of weeks and likely to start shortly thereafter. āThat will make a big difference in this question of whether and when an exchange-traded product gets approved,ā the commissioner opined.
As for the bitcoin market, Peirce detailed:
In the three years that Iāve been at the commission, the market has matured tremendously. We are seeing a lot of institutional interest in the market. We are seeing sort of quasi exchange-traded products in it.
Peirce then pointed out that Canada has alreadyĀ approvedĀ some bitcoin ETFs. āYou are seeing much more institutional involvement in the underlying market,ā she noted, adding that these are āthe type of things that might make us comfortable in terms of how that underlying market works.ā
The commissioner emphasized: āThe bitcoin market is never gonna look like an equity market, for example, so I think trying to impose that kind of a structure on the underlying market is inappropriate. That was what was hinted at in some of those prior disapprovals.ā
Commenting on how other countries may be ahead of the U.S. in terms of innovation, Peirce said:
I think we are certainly behind the curve. We have seen other countries take a much more, I would say, productive approach to regulating crypto in the sense that it is not saying we shouldnāt have any regulations at all, theyāve just been saying letās build a regulatory framework that works for crypto.
āOur approach has been much more of a āsay no and tell people to waitā approach,ā she described. āSo I think we really need to turn it around, be willing to work, to build a framework that is appropriate for this industry. Iām optimistic that with the new chairman coming in, who has deep knowledge of these markets, the crypto markets, that is something that we could do together, to build a good regulatory framework.ā

